<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:26:26 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>The Obvious? - Comments</title><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.9.3 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>David Cushman comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>David Cushman</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:38:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7773558</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Euan, I'm going to the Social Business Summit in London on March 18. It sounds like it's may be more structured. We should compare notes soup v structure when you get back :-)</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Anne Marie comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Anne Marie</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:03:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7773346</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like some great conversations are going to be had at the Social Busines Edge gathering.</p><p>Am so with you on the 'back to the future' perspective, Euan - my irritation at the CIPD claiming that 'smart working' is a new paradigm led me to write a book in praise of the relevance of old knowledge. </p><p>Serves me right - writing not an easy process. Got to be said, though. </p><p>Looking forward to hearing about Social Business Edge.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Lewis Evans comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Lewis Evans</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:41:32 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7772814</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the response Euan. I am not 'keen to avoid' people. I'd actually love to come and have some of those conversations. I was just curious as to what the intention was behind it. I have asked Stowe as well, and I'd love to hear how it goes. thanks also for the suggestion. I just might do that!</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Euan comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Euan</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7772305</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Jackie - I'd love to!</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Euan comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Euan</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 05:28:25 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7772218</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Andy - couldn't agree more. In fact I have started calling some of my workshops &quot;Back to the future&quot;.</p><p>Lewis - you'd have been better asking Stowe that question. From what I gather he is trying to avoid people from a stage talking at people in an audience. Personally I am going to have fun conversations with fun people and would be quite happy if none of that takes place on a stage. </p><p>I am also quite happy with &quot;a soup of ideas&quot;. Isn't asking for &quot;a solution&quot; conferring the very status to those involved that you seem keen to avoid? I would suggest, with the same politeness that you have offered your own comment, that if you want to run something aimed at achieving a conclusion you could always organise something yourself.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Jackie Danicki comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Jackie Danicki</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:29:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7769311</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hope you have a minute for a cup of tea with me when you're over! Would be really lovely to catch up.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Lewis Evans comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Lewis Evans</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:29:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7769310</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Euan. This looks very interesting, and congratulations for being part of it. My concern, if I have one, is that I hear of lots of events such as this where we are given a soup of different ideas from so-called influential people (no offense intended). Isn't there a better way to structure such events, so there is a progression to a solution or conclusion rather than just an uncoordinated bunch of speeches presenting a mix of ideas that don't add up to anything in particular, and just massage the egos and reputations of the speakers? (Again, no offense intended, I just can't think of a better way of putting it!). Maybe this is different, but there's no info here to suggest otherwise. If I am completely out of order, please tell me, and let me know what this conference is intended to achieve.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>Lewis</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Jeff De Cagna comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Jeff De Cagna</author><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:24:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7769279</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Euan, I'm looking forward to seeing you in New York next month.  I'm very excited about Stowe's gathering, and I can't wait for the conversations to unfold.  Travel safely.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Andy Tedd comments on Social Business Edge</title><author>Andy Tedd</author><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:57:59 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/3/15/social-business-edge.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7768895</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I wish the language around this could be framed more obviously in terms of a return to the way things have been, rather than as if it 'social business' is something new. </p><p>'Unsocial business', the division of labour, Taylorism, etc, etc are an evolutionary blip and we are are getting back to doing things the way we have have been designed to do them. Social business is as old as time, well older actually, when you think about it.</p><p>I think if we talked about it in terms of the 'old' it might seem a lot less scary to people who might resist it :)</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Alex Parr comments on Buildings are a bugger</title><author>Alex Parr</author><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:54:54 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.euansemple.com/theobvious/2010/2/11/buildings-are-a-bugger.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">322738:3785858:comment/7582113</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts Euan, as ever.  I'm not sure about the IT point though.  At least in a large corporation, they normally have an IT department who can immediately sort out your problems, whereas if you are anything like me (which you definitely are not) who doesn't have a clue about IT, when things do go wrong, it's a disaster! </p><p>I can't understand why everyone thinks &quot;open plan&quot; is so great?  Generally, the kitchen is smaller as the executives don't want &quot;chit chat&quot; from the minions which means that in effect the workers get glued to their computer screens; don't communicate with anyone except with colleagues in their bubble and become extremely isolated.  Furthermore, there seems to be a lack of consideration shown by those attending meetings who receive calls on their mobiles and take them outside the meeting in the &quot;open space&quot; disrupting everyone else.</p><p>I like the idea of Roman baths!</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>