About this blog

This is my personal blog which I began in February 2001. I called it The Obvious? when I wrote anonymously and chose the name to reflect the fact I have to overcome my inhibitions about stating the obvious!

Recent Comments
Current Reading
  • The Support Economy: Why Corporations are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism
    The Support Economy: Why Corporations are Failing Individuals and the Next Episode of Capitalism
    by Shoshana Zuboff, James Maxmin
MyBlogLog
Blogroll

This form does not yet contain any fields.
    Search
    « Flickr but without the photos | Main | Young folks nowadays »
    Wednesday
    Dec062006

    Nice place you have here

    In an e-mail correspondence with Tim Spalding from LibraryThing about Enterprise 2.0 I finally put my finger on why I don't like SharePoint.

    If social computing is going to be effective in the workplace things have to be different - fundamentally.

    When we started building this stuff at the BBC we were consciously trying to build the online equivalent of a collection of Cotswold villages with lots of footpaths between them. You know where the pub and church are, you’re comfortable in the environment and you can locate yourself. Corporate systems tend to be more like Milton Keynes. On the surface they’re efficient with lots of straight lines and signposting, but you get lost because everything looks the same.

    Using a new tool really does feel like walking into a room and working out what the atmosphere is like, what the other people are like, whether they feel like people I could get on with and whether we will be allowed to take our time to form a relationship and begin to get things done. Dave Snowden was right when he said that you can’t manage knowledge but you can create a knowledge ecology.

    I can't put my finger in what it is - the graphics, the language used or the intentions behind the software but I rarely get this feeling from Microsoft stuff especially not SharePoint. They are too good at creating sterile environments run by control freaks who hate messiness, consider conversations unprofessional and rarely understand the true pulse of their organisations.

    This stuff may be seen as "business-like" at the moment but I don't believe it will be what business is like in the future.

    Reader Comments (16)

    Hi there, just wanted to point you towards my new blog focusing specifically on Enterprise 2.0

    http://adamkcarson.wordpress.com/
    December 4, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterAdam Carson
    and now for something completely different: why do you ignore my old blog http://evilkm.blogspot.com/ ?I want comments: tips and tricks, how to get rich quick, where to get cheap Vlagra, and which blogs I should read.
    December 4, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterchristianhauck
    Agree with your post about Sharepoint (having recently implemented for the IDeA). Would much prefer to use something like ConnectBeam (www.connectbeam.com), which enables you to know your pub from your church, and to take a leisurely stroll between the two with your friends. Maybe the difference is that ConnectBeam is focussed on 'KM' (connections between people) and Sharepoint is focussed on 'IM', i.e. the organisation of explicit knowledge.

    p.s. Good interview on Gurteen - the best messages are those that are simple and to the point!

    December 4, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Dale
    One thing though, legacy investments for attention are there in SharePoint, so you need a compromise -- SocialPoint.

    But you probably already know this.
    December 4, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRoss Mayfield
    You're going to have to say that again for me slower Ross!
    December 5, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterEuan Semple
    I interpret Ross' statement to mean that in places using Sharepoint, the workers using it have access to stuff they now use, and have developed some workflow / work habits that involve the use of Sharepoint .. all the already-established points of interaction with Sharepoint's design and functionality.

    If not that, then I'll appreciate another run-through as well.
    December 6, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterJon Husband
    Ross is the CEO of SocialText, an enterprise wiki company.

    They recently announced a SharePoint plugin.

    http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=177884
    December 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterPhil Wilson
    He's also a good friend of mine Phil so I am aware of his work with Sharepoint but thanks for pointing it out to my other readers.
    December 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterEuan Semple
    Ah, sure thing! Your comment didn't give any context for which bit wasn't making sense.

    That'll teach me :)
    December 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterPhil Wilson
    It was more Ross's grammar than the context that was challenging me!
    December 7, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterEuan Semple
    Well better late than never to the party I guess :-) I missed commenting on this at the time, too busy blowing out candles...

    You're right, we need tools to support new ways of working rather than just sustain traditions. But I'm more concerned about the lack of people who want to walk in that direction and instead cling to their old staid worlds of hierarchy, command-and-control, don't think-just do and kid yourself there will be a pension at the end of it all. If you want to change your work environment, you can bash pretty much any old piece of technology into some sort of shape to suit your purpose, but the organisation has got to want to go there...

    Mind you, SharePoint could be a lot less sterile and more fun to use. Unfortunately, thanks to regulation, SOX and co, those deploying it are more concerned with standards, consistency, templates, auditing, managed processes... they think sterile is great :-(

    disclaimer: I used to be the UK lead at MS for SharePoint, feel free to accuse me of bias ;-)

    Happy New Year!
    January 2, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSharon
    Thanks for the great comment Sharon and for re-enforcing the point that it ain't about the technology so much as the mindset both of those whom it is done to and those who do it to them!
    January 2, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEuan Semple
    "They are too good at creating sterile environments run by control freaks who hate messiness, consider conversations unprofessional and rarely understand the true pulse of their organisations."





    Take a look at this:

    hedkandi.com

    Believe it or not, that is SharePoint...
    January 3, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTrevor C Williamson
    I'll grant it looks funky but not sure it negates my concerns - and I'll set aside the fact that the first page after the front page was well and truly broken in Firefox!

    ;-)

    January 3, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEuan Semple
    I like your village metaphor, but perhaps SharePoint is more like the design classic the London Underground map, it makes some that grew organically and is this difficult to navigate into something, clear and its way beautiful. Unlike being on the tube itself...
    February 9, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterStephen Cummins
    Dear,I agree on the mindset argument, but what is as important is what the current enterprise vendors are doing/saying. SAP is committing 400 MLN Euro (!) in the next 8 quarters "to improve their GUI".What I mean with that is that they are trying to "ipod-tize" the GUI of the enterprise into something which will fit the "2.0 trend".In my organisation we are doing the same (have a look at the link). It's fun to do but very challenging, just to see what you can offer in a free, bronze, silver, gold and platinum version of you (old) software version.

    So it is a mind set thing, but only when the barrier to try is low and with very little risk. Will keep you posted on our work in progress,

    Cheers

    Bart
    February 20, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBart Stevens

    PostPost a New Comment

    Enter your information below to add a new comment.

    My response is on my own website »
    Author Email (optional):
    Author URL (optional):
    Post:
     
    Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>